Judges who serve in lifetime seats on the federal courts make decisions that impact women, children, and families.  From the schools we can attend to whom we can marry, federal judges impact every aspect of our lives.

Our courts, by the numbers

(as of May 1, 2021)
74%
of all sitting judges are white…

with white men making up 60% of the federal bench.

51%
of the population are women…

yet only 33% of the federal bench

43%
of people living in America are people of color…

yet make up only 26% of the federal bench.

Federal courts should reflect the communities they serve. Bringing diverse experiences and perspectives to the bench allows judges to make better-informed decisions, in addition to increasing public confidence in their rulings.

Because #CourtsMatter, NCJW believes all federal judges must be:

Fair

Do they respect equality and justice for all and understand the impact of the law on everyone?

Independent

Are they impartial, nonpartisan, and not influenced by outside parties or interests?

Qualified

Have they been objectively assessed for their experience, competence, principles, and temperament?

Why Do Courts Matter?

This video was created by Civic Nebraska and Courts Matter Nebraska.

Meet a Federal Judicial Nominee

Anthony Powell

Nominated for a Lifetime Position to:
District Court for the District of Kansas

NCJW opposes Anthony Powell Here’s why:  Anthony (Tony) Powell has long worked to advance far-right policy agendas, including efforts to attack and undermine reproductive rights, civil rights, and further politicize what should be an independent judiciary. As such, it is clear he would not be a fair or independent judge who remains faithful to constitutional … Continued

Fair? No
Independent? No
Qualified? No
Confirmed? Pending

Tony Mattivi

Nominated for a Lifetime Position to:
District Court for the District of Kansas

NCJW opposes Tony Mattivi. Here’s why: Tony Mattivi has a record that calls into question his ability to be fair and independent. In the Kansas Attorney General’s office and as head of the Kansas Bureau of Investigation, he has taken extreme stands on issues such as reproductive rights and has weaponized his power to the … Continued

Fair? No
Independent? No
Qualified? No
Confirmed? Pending

Justin Smith

Nominated for a Lifetime Position to:
the Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals

NCJW opposes Justin Smith. Here’s why: Justin Smith is a partisan loyalist who served as President Trump’s personal attorney, working on the Supreme Court case which granted presidential immunity, and the case seeking to overturn the civil judgement against Trump in the sexual assault case involving E. Jean Carroll. His role in these cases, which … Continued

Fair? No
Independent? No
Qualified? No
Confirmed? Pending

Kathleen “Katie” Lane

Nominated for a Lifetime Position to:
District Court for the District of Montana

NCJW opposes Kathleen Lane. Here’s why:  NCJW opposes Katie Lane. Her qualifications are sorely lacking in every respect. She only has nine years of legal experience, less than the American Bar Association’s recommended 12 years for a federal judgeship. Her record calls into question her fairness, independence, and fidelity to constitutional values. She received a … Continued

Fair? No
Independent? No
Qualified? No
Confirmed? Pending

William Crain

Nominated for a Lifetime Position to:
the District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana

NCJW opposes William Crain. Here’s why: William Crain has been explicit and public about the fact that his judgement is based on his extreme conservative personal beliefs rather than on an impartial understanding of the case before him and the law. He ran a highly partisan campaign for election to the Louisiana Supreme Court, and … Continued

Fair? No
Independent? No
Qualified? No
Confirmed? Yes

Thank you to Alliance for Justice for their extensive research vetting these nominees.