Judges who serve in lifetime seats on the federal courts make decisions that impact women, children, and families.  From the schools we can attend to whom we can marry, federal judges impact every aspect of our lives.

Our courts, by the numbers

(as of May 1, 2021)
74%
of all sitting judges are white…

with white men making up 60% of the federal bench.

51%
of the population are women…

yet only 33% of the federal bench

43%
of people living in America are people of color…

yet make up only 26% of the federal bench.

Federal courts should reflect the communities they serve. Bringing diverse experiences and perspectives to the bench allows judges to make better-informed decisions, in addition to increasing public confidence in their rulings.

Because #CourtsMatter, NCJW believes all federal judges must be:

Fair

Do they respect equality and justice for all and understand the impact of the law on everyone?

Independent

Are they impartial, nonpartisan, and not influenced by outside parties or interests?

Qualified

Have they been objectively assessed for their experience, competence, principles, and temperament?

Why Do Courts Matter?

This video was created by Civic Nebraska and Courts Matter Nebraska.

Meet a Federal Judicial Nominee

William Crain

Nominated for a Lifetime Position to:
the District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana

NCJW opposes William Crain. Here’s why: William Crain has been explicit and public about the fact that his judgement is based on his extreme conservative personal beliefs rather than on an impartial understanding of the case before him and the law. He ran a highly partisan campaign for election to the Louisiana Supreme Court, and … Continued

Fair? No
Independent? No
Qualified? No
Confirmed? Yes

Robert Chamberlin

Nominated for a Lifetime Position to:
the District Court for the Northern District of Mississippi

NCJW opposes Robert Chamberlin. Here’s why: Whether as a Mississippi state legislator or as a Justice on the Mississippi Supreme Court, Justice Chamberlin has shown a hostility to constitutional rights that calls into question his ability to be a fair and independent federal judge. He has worked to elevate Christianity in public institutions in the … Continued

Fair? No
Independent? No
Qualified? No
Confirmed? Yes

Anna St. John

Nominated for a Lifetime Position to:
the District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana

NCJW opposes Anna St. John. Here’s why:  As head of the Hamilton Legal Law Institute, a far-right legal organization, Anna St. John led lawsuits challenging consumer rights, gender equality, civil rights, and human rights. She testified against bipartisan legislation to end forced arbitration in sexual assault and harassment cases even though it has been proven … Continued

Fair? No
Independent? No
Qualified? No
Confirmed? Pending

Edmund LaCour

Nominated for a Lifetime Position to:
The District Court for the Northern District of Alabama

NCJW opposes Edmund LaCour. Here’s why: Whether voting rights, civil rights, or reproductive rights, Mr. LaCour has shown himself to be hostile to constitutional protections. He defended Alabama’s near-total abortion ban, one of the nation’s harshest, calling Roe v. Wade  “unworkable” and “illegitimate” and asked the Supreme Court to overturn it. He argued that delaying … Continued

Fair? No
Independent? No
Qualified? No
Confirmed? Yes

William Mercer

Nominated for a Lifetime Position to:
District Court for the District of Montana

NCJW opposes William Mercer. Here’s why: Mr. Mercer’s record raises concerns about his commitment to justice and constitutional principles. As both a federal prosecutor and a state legislator, he has advocated for excessively harsh policies, from appealing reasonable sentences for nonviolent offenses to supporting legislation that would expand mass incarceration. His attempts at redirecting public … Continued

Fair? No
Independent? No
Qualified? No
Confirmed? Yes