Judges who serve in lifetime seats on the federal courts make decisions that impact women, children, and families.  From the schools we can attend to whom we can marry, federal judges impact every aspect of our lives.

Our courts, by the numbers

(as of May 1, 2021)
74%
of all sitting judges are white…

with white men making up 60% of the federal bench.

51%
of the population are women…

yet only 33% of the federal bench

43%
of people living in America are people of color…

yet make up only 26% of the federal bench.

Federal courts should reflect the communities they serve. Bringing diverse experiences and perspectives to the bench allows judges to make better-informed decisions, in addition to increasing public confidence in their rulings.

Because #CourtsMatter, NCJW believes all federal judges must be:

Fair

Do they respect equality and justice for all and understand the impact of the law on everyone?

Independent

Are they impartial, nonpartisan, and not influenced by outside parties or interests?

Qualified

Have they been objectively assessed for their experience, competence, principles, and temperament?

Why Do Courts Matter?

This video was created by Civic Nebraska and Courts Matter Nebraska.

Meet a Federal Judicial Nominee

Kasdin Mitchell

Nominated for a Lifetime Position to:
the United States District Court of the Northern District of Texas

NCJW opposes Kasdin Mitchell. Here’s why: Kasdin Mitchell’s record raises serious concerns about her ability to serve as a fair and independent federal judge. She has longstanding ties to ideologically extreme legal organizations, including serving as a John Marshall Fellow at the Claremont Institute and participating in the Teneo Network. She has also advanced legal … Continued

Fair? No
Independent? No
Qualified? No
Confirmed? Pending

Angela Colmenero

Nominated for a Lifetime Position to:
the United States District Court of the South District of Texas

NCJW opposes Angela Colmenero. Here’s why: Angela Colmenero’s career raises serious concerns about her ability to serve as a fair and independent federal judge. Throughout her tenure in the Texas Attorney General’s Office, she played a leading role defending some of the nation’s most restrictive abortion laws, challenging protections for transgender youth, defending discriminatory voting … Continued

Fair? No
Independent? No
Qualified? No
Confirmed? Pending

Judge Daniel Traynor

Nominated for a Lifetime Position to:
the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

NCJW opposes Judge Daniel Traynor. Here’s why: Judge Daniel Traynor’s record raises serious concerns about his ability to serve as a fair and impartial federal judge. His partisanship has been unusually public, including a 2016 social media post declaring, “It feels good to be deplorable #MAGA.” On the bench, he has consistently issued rulings that … Continued

Fair? No
Independent? No
Qualified? No
Confirmed? Pending

Judge Matthew Byrne

Nominated for a Lifetime Position to:
the United States District Court for the Southern District of Ohio

NCJW opposes Judge Matthew Byrne. Here’s why: Judge Matthew Byrne has a long record of affiliation with and advocacy for ideologically extreme legal organizations, including nearly two decades of involvement with the Federalist Society, where he served as a local chapter president. He has also received support from anti-abortion and gun rights groups during his … Continued

Fair? No
Independent? No
Qualified? No
Confirmed? Pending

Michael Martin

Nominated for a Lifetime Position to:
the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan

NCJW opposes Michael Martin. Here’s why: As Criminal Chief at the US Attorney’s Office for the Eastern District of Michigan, Michael Martin holds a senior leadership role overseeing federal criminal prosecutions. His record raises serious concerns about whether he would bring the independence, fairness, and impartiality required for a lifetime appointment to the federal bench. … Continued

Fair? No
Independent? No
Qualified? No
Confirmed? Pending

Thank you to Alliance for Justice for their extensive research vetting these nominees.